Prerna Mid-Term Assignment


1. Write two poems, each in the voice of any historical or mythological character of your choice. You may want to choose a particular moment in that character's life and attempt to explore how they would respond to that moment.


1. Note: Sita in the Ramayana has always been portrayed as a submissive, acquiescent, almost voiceless sort of a woman who always goes along with her husband's plans, irrespective of the inconveniences she often faces. Here, I've made an attempt to portray her view of things, which has sadly been almost erased from the epic. Our literature, scriptures and histories have often been recorded by men, with little attention paid to women's points of view. Perhaps if we did get a chance to hear their voices, we might find them completely different (and also more human) from the many ways in which they have been portrayed. 

        Sita


           He looked at me with distaste
His wife, curled up on the
dirty lounge sofa, reeking of
his Future

         A stained glass in one hand
A burnt butt in the other
that I held on to long after
It had died.

That’s how he held on to
our past, anyway.

Too much Past.

It ran up our streets
Glaring at me
          while they glorified
          my Piety

And the wars, too
hurtling from
inside posters;
A young, sniffled out Honesty

You always disappoint me.”
I couldn’t help smiling.


You see, he never let them know
about the Leaving
The dreary, tired act of swishing up
suitcases;
The child custody.

“The house is a mess. The floor is…
The window grills..
The laundry…”

The laundry.
He hadn’t thought of that
while he made me wait
for 14 years
barely draping myself in cotton
Using leaves
In lieu of napkins.

I guess he changed that
version too, I said as
He slumped on to
the sofa.

A fat, ruined man
sloshed in mustard
and washed up dreams.
A has been.

Did they never think?
That History;
broken like the broken mosque
that they helped break,
was seething.

I sighed.

Men, I thought to myself,
Men and their distorted histories.







2.   Note: In the Ramayana, the character of Shurpanakha has been described by Valmiki as Ghora Mukhi or 'generally ugly.' In fact, this character, despite being vital to the storyline, has constantly been denigrated and ridiculed on account of her appearance and behavior by not only the protagonists of the epic but also the audiences who continue to read/consume it. Her only 'fault' has been to not fit into the mould of the ideal woman; Shurpanakha not only did not conform to the standards of beauty, she was condescended to because of her unapologetic desire for Rama.
Here I've tried to see her as the powerful, unapologetic woman she was who has often been misrepresented by audiences and authors alike.









 Ghora Mukhi



I still see her
While she combs her hair,
wild and still, like a forest flower.
She bathes her skin
refocuses her Glare
Glancing and wounded
like a deer.


Rama turned her away.
He hated her bellowing self.
She brought him fruit
she offered him a drink
She never waited for a signal
She was too woman for him.

Pot bellied,
with breasts as ripe
as her desire for things
Why did she have to be
so present?
Did she not know that as a woman
she ought to have been
a tad unobtrusive?

She went for it.
Unapologetic
and disregarding.

And when all had been said
and done,
and she was left
wounded and bleeding,
She bandaged her skin
And tied up her spirit.


Rama was gone.
She didn’t mind the refusal,
she had seen it far too many times,
after all.
Her pitch black
almost starless skin
Her laughter that resembled
the fullness of a morning
(they couldn’t understand it,
no.
Why did she have to be
so present?)

She just wishes.
She just wishes that
in the dreary aftermath
of his rejection
he had treated her
a little bit more Human.


---------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



2. Read 'Learning the Poetic Line: How line breaks shape meaning' by Rebecca Hazelton - https://www.poetryfoundation.org/articles/70144/learning-the-poetic-line. Write two poems where each poem has at least two deliberate line-breaks using any of the "Wagner’s six S’s: speed, sound, syntax, surprise, sense, and space." In a small note after each poem, explain your usages of these line-breaks.




1.  Deranged



It’s dangerous.
Pugnacious, violent but
self-effacing.



Raw, green,
                                       hiding in the dingy corners of
my mind.
                   Whispering at the crack of
Rising dawn.




Lying beside me all night.
                                   As I stare out the old
crumbling wooden crevice.

But I want to elude the daylight Want to
            crush my heels Stand on
the balls of my feet and
follow the night.
Follow this furious, vicious child
For once.


Want to leave the stale, accurate, precise
pulpit I want
to go
Rumble down the staircase Stare
at my veins that
keep me alive.


I want to rush down
that indiscernible
inaccessible lane
of my life.
Smoke words that injure my mind.

I want to hijack
her dirty inner excruciation fill it in my blood and
go fly.
Over unknown,
taboo,
shrinking shrines.

I want to capture
my breath
And bottle it, seal it
in a crude, fanatical sea far

from my mind. I want to feel
reverberated at
the cost of my life.




Note: This poem captures Speed with its short, crisp lines, especially in the first stanza. Writing shorter lines that almost jump along heightens the mood that the poem tries to create (that of a restless, almost inebriated state of mind.)

In the second and third stanza, it also uses Space to heighten the tension (some lines are left-aligned, some are not).





2.  Aurora


Words. Words. Words.
A bright morning.
Windows with light sheets
trailing them.
The coffee spilled on the tray.
The smell of mud.
The tree coiling
from beneath the staircase.

How exquisite can they all be
if the words that die
that anguishing, tedious death
veiled beneath them
never died-
but remained as they do
every morning

full of piping melodies
and the deep plush mirage.
How things never quieten.
How,
as the onlookers never acknowledge
Silence talks
that slow, calamitous, pristine talk.

Every morning.




Note: In this poem, I have maintained regular Syntax to highlight the calming mood the poem tries to create.

     The last line, left by itself, also makes use of Space to emphasize the topic.


-------------------------------------------------------------------


3. Write two poems, each using repetition of a word or a phrase. Think of our classroom discussion where we realized how repetition achieves different effects, whether it be lending weight, creating irony, exploring multiple meanings of the same word or phrase, among others

 1. Untitled



The heart is a wiry athlete,
A bubbling broth
A pebble in a pipe
an unwashable,
creasing
cloth



Stuck, stuck
like pieces of metal in a sock
Feet puke rust
nside glistening shoe blocks



My heart, my heart
tearing through
My body; tender like sock



Note: Here there is repetition of words in two stanzas, the second and the third. In both these stanzas, the repetition creates weight and emphasizes the meaning of the said words and also the mood of the poem.




2. Stuck


Tethered by words

Bound by skin

Fettered self-

inside released skin

I see corals,

you see limbs

Body, Body-

You lock me in



My breasts are a crosspiece

my heart a cage

My head, a series of rails

Housing a breathing

History

Housing a breathing history of

the Other Race.


Note: In the second and last stanza of this poem, the last two lines are repetitive. However, when the line is repeated the second time there are added words that create multiple meanings.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------






 

 

 


Comments

  1. Hi Prerna, I like the way you wrote on Sita's perspective about men in the last concluding paragraphs. The lines "A has been " and "Men and their distorted histories " drives the final nail on the wall. It speaks of toxic masculinity in the slightest but strongest way.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The poem about Sita is impressive. You brought in a contemporary touch and a scathing critique of how her history has been distorted again and again.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment